Monthly Archives: April 2011
A Turing test for the meaninglessness of parameter mapping in digital art.
They’re at-it again! Those krazy kids with coding skills attached to their right brains. This time, they’re mapping barcodes to pitches. Nice app. Well designed. Simple. Intuitive. I bought it. Tried it on 6 barcodes. Didn’t work. Dont know why. Doesn’t … Continue reading
On Volume(2)
In the previous post, I described how the use of fading volume could break the suspension of disbelief of a spatial audio image, because it is physically unrealistic. Now I am going invert the argument. Space is implicit in perceived … Continue reading
On Volume (1)
Is there any such thing as reducing the volume? Its not a trick question. If there’s a truck across the road, I can’t reduce its volume. When the truck drives away, its volume will fade with distance. If I close … Continue reading
Obscureness
Its extraordinarily frustrating to work in spatial audio composition because so few people can consume the work. I find it increasingly difficult to remain inspired by new ideas since I know that only a handful of people might get to … Continue reading
Spatial encoding modes.
In sound, and especially in Electroacoustic sound, spatial information can originate from different modes. The images below attempt to illustrate some of these modes. The observation that I would like to make is that these modes can and will co-exist … Continue reading