“Climate change” vs “global warming”

A few months ago, I was astounded to hear in a documentary shown on TV (SBS) that it was a ‘communications consultant’ called Frank Luntz who had suggested/introduced the term ‘climate change’ to the US administration. The purpose, ofcourse, was to remove the threatening tone implied in the words ‘global warming’ … Luntz suggested that the best way to rebut the science of global warming was to change the language and use the words ‘climate change’.

The astounding thing is that now all those who take ‘global warming’ seriously are using the term ‘climate change’, probably unawares that this was a language introduced to rebut their very concerns.

To me this really demonstrates the power of the combination of language and reach. It is scary that one individual can peddle public perception simply by changeing the language associated with a topic. Ofcourse, it works both ways … except, for the ‘citizens of the world’, we must all cohere to change the language.

So, please, lets lose the words ‘climate change’ and revert back to the more aptly descriptive term ‘global warming’.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to “Climate change” vs “global warming”

  1. Pingback: change » “Climate change” vs “global warming”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s